2015-02-05 5:13 GMT+01:00 <lu...@proxima.alt.za>: > > > But why we don't have Tmove for example? > > Because its semantics are much, much more complex and the users need > to be aware of the difference.
This shouldn't be so hard to obtain. I mean we could simply introduce a new command "rename oldpath newpath" that only works when both path share the same mount point. This way the mv commands would keep the old "safe" semantic, while the new command would protect the user to accidentally disclosure his data to the world via the cloud. > Imagine a Tmove that transfers your > entire disk contents to the cloud: would you like it to be perceived > as trivial? What happens if you interrupt it? Worse, what happens if > you can't interrupt it? I won't be drammatic: you can always unplug the enthernet! :-D Btw, I see the point. Giacomo
