I choose - "Waste of time" Too many hardware versions ( http://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/developer-information-for-chrome-os-devices ) And, how about vendor-locks (Google :) )?
2014-12-08 2:59 GMT+03:00 da Tyga <cyberfo...@gmail.com>: > I think that Plan9Port using the underlying Linux OS might be a better > choice. I have also been thinking about cross-compiling from a Plan9 > install (such as that on Raspberry Pi) to Samsung ARM based ChromeBook. > > Getting Plan9 to work with fastboot and implementing device drivers for > the various ChromeBooks might be a lot of work. Don't know enough to > justify my assumptions though. > > On 8 December 2014 at 06:35, Roswell Grey <orangecal...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It's no question that the Chromebook makes a wonderful candidate to >> integrate features of 9 into. The thing was practically BUILT for >> distributed computing, what with app servers and cloud integration tightly >> integrated into the hardware. What I was thinking was creating a chrome >> extension for 9P and the distributed file system, so that there'd be an >> easy way to connect 9 machines and maybe even create a chrome 9 grid for >> super processing. What would be your opinion on doing such a thing? >> Practical? Waste of time? Wanna help? >> > > -- С наилучшими пожеланиями Жилкин Сергей With best regards Zhilkin Sergey
