> @@ -1594,6 +1595,7 @@
> static Ints7 oid_md4WithRSAEncryption = {7, 1, 2, 840, 113549, 1, 1, 3 };
> static Ints7 oid_md5WithRSAEncryption = {7, 1, 2, 840, 113549, 1, 1, 4 };
> static Ints7 oid_sha1WithRSAEncryption ={7, 1, 2, 840, 113549, 1, 1, 5 };
> +static Ints7 sha256WithRSAEncryption ={7, 1, 2, 840, 113549, 1, 1, 11 };
> static Ints7 oid_sha1WithRSAEncryptionOiw ={6, 1, 3, 14, 3, 2, 29 };
> static Ints7 oid_md5 ={6, 1, 2, 840, 113549, 2, 5, 0 };
> static Ints *alg_oid_tab[NUMALGS+1] = {
> @@ -1602,6 +1604,7 @@
> (Ints*)&oid_md4WithRSAEncryption,
> (Ints*)&oid_md5WithRSAEncryption,
> (Ints*)&oid_sha1WithRSAEncryption,
> + (Ints*)&sha256WithRSAEncryption,
> (Ints*)&oid_sha1WithRSAEncryptionOiw,
> (Ints*)&oid_md5,
> nil
The existing identifiers are prefixed with "oid_"; is there a reason
for leaving the prefix out?
Lucio.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email has been scanned by the MxScan Email Security System.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
