> Not without substantial development work (I'd bet more than simply putting > NAT on Plan 9). Once you get Plan 9's /net on the linux box, nothing's going > to know what to do with it. The existing p9p code won't use it directly, nor > will iptables know how to send packets there. > > If you want Plan 9 to do NAT, just do that.
i'm not proud of this solution, but i'm using a ubiquity wifi router as my nat. it routes all external traffic to /net.alt on the main cpu server, and routes outbound traffic through a nat. i would much prefer a p9 based solution, but i'm also busy and lazy. - erik
