> Still I don't get what you mean. In that message we say > 1) quality of TeX typesetting is better, > 2) the way the equation is written (the syntax) in eqn feels > better to me.
Ok, I got that wrong. > Just to be sure. I don't mean readability of documents to be typeset. > I mean the source code of the whole system. I.e., in the case of LaTeX, > the readability/understanding/hackability of the macros' definitions. I got that wrong too... And thank you for the advice regarding gv(1) and printed output. I had not expected a difference there. With printed output I have no errors with DWB (except the TAB). (With P9P there is still the root sign shift.) Carsten
