> I noticed this on a fresh install from the usbinstamd64.bz2 downloaded
> today. I am typing the error. The error is while it is compiling the
> amd64 programs..
> 
> [...]
> mk syscall
> sed '/#define...
> ....
> 6c -I/sys/src/libc/9syscall -FTVw syscall.c
> tab.h:52 syscall.c:34 name not declared: _nsec
> mk: 6c -I/sys ... : exit status=rc 20800: 6c 20802: error
> mk: for(i in 1a ... : exit status=rc 9085: rc 20789: mk 20792: error
> mk: test -e ... error
> mk: date for (i ... : ... error
> halt system? ...

ok.  there must have been version skew.  i rebuilt everything.  but i'm 
traveling, so i didn't
do any sanity checking. 

_nsec is just for binary compatability with the nsec system call.  i'm still
unconvinced, but i don't want to introduce an incompatability like that either.

by the way, one of the least attractive things about an nsec system call is
high frequency high precision timing would be much better off with a
relative clock that is not adjusted.  cf. the linux leap second fiasco.
TSC is probablly ideal for this on intel machines.

- erik

Reply via email to