Yes I agree, it's better that way. Is there a list somewhere on the web with all those 9atom patches?
On Jun 22, 2014, at 5:57 PM, erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net> wrote: >> On 22 June 2014 23:25, Yoann Padioleau <p...@fb.com> wrote: >> >>> if(up != p && (p->wired == nil || p->wired == MACHP(m->machno)) >>> m->readied = p; >>> >> >> yes, because on 386 m is effectively a constant. the code was written with >> extern register Mach *m in mind. >> > > > 9atom has had it as > > if(up != p && (p->wired == nil || p->wired->machno == m->machno)) > > which i believe is equivalent, and less obnoxious. the pc kernel should be > rewritten > with the GS extern register bit, and then we could get rid of MACHP. > > - erik >
