On Sun Jun 8 13:51:18 EDT 2014, charles.fors...@gmail.com wrote: > On 8 June 2014 18:34, erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net> wrote: > > > well, those are the measurements. do you think they are misleading? > > perhaps > > with the pio happening in another context? i haven't hunted this down. > > > > the difference is only how fault makes the copy (easy or hard), there > shouldn't be any call to pio either way.
unless the image is not cached, or doesn't have 1 reference. - erik
