There were problems in p9p under linux, when amail makes simultaneous searches in different windows.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 4:23 PM, quanstro <quans...@gmail.com> wrote: > in theory the threads that interact with regular expressions in acme > are all cooperatively scheduled. have you seen a case where they > are not? did pthreads blow up the model? > > - erik > > > On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 7:11:02 AM UTC-4, Alexander Sychev wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have commited some changes in my experimental fork of plan9port. >> https://bitbucket.org/santucco/plan9port >> >> For acme I made thread safe processing of regular expressions (actually >> by creating some context). >> For upas/nfs I made a monitoring of all mailboxes and a decoding of >> international names of mailboxes. >> >> I'm living with these changes for some time, they are working. >> >> P.S. >> By the way, new log feature is excellent, it's a time to make more >> applications for acme :-) >> -- >> Best regards, >> santucco >> > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "plan9port-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to plan9port-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Best regards, santucco
