On 6 May 2014 10:52, <tlaro...@polynum.com> wrote:

> like systems, one may not be even able to link the thing.


Recently I saw that the source of the underlying engine for (I think)
Chrome had roughly
halved in size. I'm not sure if that's the same version as the you've got.
They'd done trendy things like devise and implement suitable abstractions
for different
parts of the graphics/browsing model, and implemented those in a modular
way, and surprisingly,
it got simpler and smaller. It's actually quite hard to do with the
browser, because the standard
specifications are not well-suited for either writing HTML or implementing
it, so it's hard
to see what abstractions might actually be needed or would work.

Reply via email to