On Thu Apr 3 01:51:59 EDT 2014, 0in...@gmail.com wrote: > > the script itself reminds me of gcc fixincludes. > > This is probably not ideal, but the alternative would be > to split libc.h in three parts: libc.h, fmt.h and utf.h > and only include libc.h in Go (because Go has his own > variants of libfmt and libutf).
why is the alternative to modify plan 9, and why can't they live with the system fmt/rune routines? - erik
