> On 12/19/2013 11:59 AM, Charles Forsyth wrote: > > > > On 19 December 2013 06:07, Bakul Shah <ba...@bitblocks.com > > <mailto:ba...@bitblocks.com>> wrote: > > > > I suppose making atime, mtime of type struct timespec would > > break too much including 9p? > > > > > > It's unfortunate that the times in the protocol have low resolution. > > I think ix does better. > > Is it time for for 9p2014?
there are ways a file server could address this without changing the protocol. for example, if the fs returned directory entries in oldest-first order, files could be ordered without reference to the time. (not that this is a good idea.) - erik
