Steve Simon <st...@quintile.net> once said:
> Whne I looked at Go - maybe 2 years ago, I could not see why
> plan9 would not adopt go's 8c/8l and libbio.
> 
> obviously others disagree as they have not been back-ported,
> but why not? - I'am not trolling, genuine question.

We couldn't adopt the Go ?[acl] toolchain wholesale
because of incompatible Go-specific changes; e.g.,
disallowing variadic C functions without a #pragma
annotation, a different symtab/pclntab format, etc.

It would take a fair bit of work to make everything
(including libmach) backwards-compatible.

  Anthony

Reply via email to