> do you fellows have any idea how to resolve this? is this go or plan 9's > 'fault'?
I have submitted CL 13303047 to address this with minimum disruption. But now I'm not quite as sure as I was at the time... ++L
> do you fellows have any idea how to resolve this? is this go or plan 9's > 'fault'?
I have submitted CL 13303047 to address this with minimum disruption. But now I'm not quite as sure as I was at the time... ++L