Thanks for clearing that up. I haven't looked at the code, but the changes in the paper looked interesting.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Nemo <nemo.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's a modified stock kernel, no need to ask because I made the changes > directly there. ;) > > Now seriously..., no plan 9 secret society has ever been actually secret and > hiding code, > as far as I know, that is. The only times I saw someone was keeping code > without publishing > it was because the code was not considered to be ready enough for others to > try. > > Don't know if I should add more ":)"s, well... > > hth > > On Jun 17, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Jiten Pathy <jpa...@mail.nanosouffle.net> wrote: > >> I am just wondering, does the "new Plan9 secret society" approve of >> the release of code ? >> >> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Francisco J Ballesteros <n...@lsub.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 6, 2013, at 7:40 PM, Francisco J Ballesteros <n...@lsub.org> wrote: >>> >>>> concat >>>> us >>> >>> Since concat'ing us may be disgusting, I should have written "contact us". >>> sorry. >>> >>> > >
