On 2013-06-04 16:43, erik quanstrom wrote:
architectures, either the native pcc or ape/cc need to get fixed
what do you mean "fixed"?
- erik
sorry, I was not very clear.
What I meant was that I (naturally) tried building with native APE first
but did not manage it. Unfortunately I did not document the problems
properly (nowadays -+ is active by default in cpp I think but there were
more stuff - possibly the "could not initialize bitfields" thing I have
hit some other times) and it is some time ago.
Now I just tried with gcc and it worked so I got a bit excited and
decided to upload as soon as possible (release early and all that).
BTW: I have been trying to adopt the modifications made to the original
port of GCC/binutils to more recent ones to have a i386-plan9 target
cross compiler on another host machine (linux, macosx, ...).
I do unfortunately not have much time playing with it though.
For APE: I probably should update the gcc-apelibs soon, but there seems
to be a state of flux currently with the new rune bits and other
modifications for recent python and go. When would be a good time to
make a snapshot?
