On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 19:38:03 Richard Miller wrote: > > At the time, the idea was just to have a single binary (usbd) carrying the > > usb stuff. Because using multiple ones implied that the kernel (usbd was > > at /boot) had multiple copies of the same libraries for each different > > binary. > When we worry about multiple copies of the same library code, sometimes the > answer is to abstract the library functionality into another fileserver. > Is there a way we could invent another usb driver layer to do that?
I don't see how making another usb stack would be a good idea. We already have enough. -- Veety
