On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:58:23PM +0000, Charles Forsyth wrote:
>
> But suppose the standard does not evidently aim to be understood, in the
> generally understood meaning of "understood",
> or there are more words in the standard than will ever appear in the
> programmer's own programs?
Do you mean as if standards were designed or "improved" by committees?
Please: stop spreading FUD! (Were are my drops? I have tachycardia
again!)
--
Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com>
http://www.kergis.com/
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C
