"Copy" is a little strong: inspired by, certainly, by way of help/help, but there's an amazing difference in the structure of acme as "text editor as file server" with many independent clients accessing it through the file system. Oberon had a more conventional module "plug-in" structure within a single process. Acme's user interface is also more strictly text-oriented, and streamlined the mouse conventions.
On 14 September 2012 15:19, erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net> wrote: > neither is knowledge of oberon ubiquitous among 9fans, who may > not realize that acme itself is a copy. >
