THX After porting it to Inferno, ethervt1605m.c works as expected on net5501
Nevertheless, I have doubts that DP83816AVNG of net4501 is properly supported by Plan 9 driver; modern 9load crashes (MAP VA PA issue) at early stage whilst ported ether83815.c with Soekris support doesn't show better result. I'll try again later on if time available [...]. Any hint, feedbak net4501 + ether83815 + recent 9load & kernel are most welcome. +F On Friday, August 24, 2012 8:24:17 PM UTC+5:30, David du Colombier wrote: > > Does anybody know what is drivers status regarding latest n/w > > > chipsets on Soekris boards? > > > > > > Is VT6105M for the NET5501 now fully supported? > > > > I have a Soekris net5501 with eight VT6105M interfaces > > and it works fine. > > > > > I am asking this because I have a bunch of them (recent boxes) but > > > could not initialize n/w properly under Inferno Native. > > > > I haven't tried Inferno, but they are properly supported on Plan 9. > > > > > So my question is this: if any is relevant, which ..../etherXXXX.c > > > has to be ported to Inferno in order to make it happen again? > > > > /sys/src/9/pc/ethervt6105m.c > > > > -- > > David du Colombier
