On Tuesday 28 of August 2012 16:10:39 Lucio De Re wrote:
> > Anyway, I do not understand how uniform crappiness can be advantageous...
> 
> The issue raised on Go-Nuts is that Bash shouldn't be used for
> installing Go, /bin/sh should be used instead.  The response is that
> Bash is the most uniformly implemented of the /bin/sh's out there and
> that none of the other shells (generally referred to as /bin/sh) can
> be relied upon not to have incompatible foibles that would trip up a
> complicated script headed #!/bin/sh.  (...)

that somehow reminds me of autoconf
*runs away*

--
dexen deVries

[[[↓][→]]]

I'm sorry that this was such a long lett­er, but I didn't have time to write 
you a short one. -- Bla­ise Pasc­al

Reply via email to