On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:06:40PM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
>
> >
> > Except by allowing a new syntax .../{a,b,c,d}/foo meaning that foo has
> > a, b, c and d as parents, the only way I see things working with the
> > utilities and the ".." treatment is to insert a special name ensuring
> > that a ".." suppression leading to this name will trigger the correct
> > answer from the fileserver.
>
> this is already the case due to union directories (as bakul points out),
> and the solution has been widely discussed.
I gather. But here, there is an union on request (descending), and a
split once you go up, since it is not the purpose to hide the
"explication" of the union...
--
Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com>
http://www.kergis.com/
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C
