On Thu May 10 17:42:46 EDT 2012, cinap_len...@gmx.de wrote: > 0.26.0: usb 0c.03.00 8086/2834 11 4:00001861 32 > Intel Corporation > 0.26.1: usb 0c.03.00 8086/2835 11 4:00001881 32 <- failed > Intel Corporation > 0.26.7: usb 0c.03.20 8086/283a 11 0:fe226c00 1024 <- failed > Intel Corporation 81EC1043 (?) ICH8 Enhanced USB2 Enhanced Host > Controller > 0.29.0: usb 0c.03.00 8086/2830 10 4:000018a1 32 > Intel Corporation > 0.29.1: usb 0c.03.00 8086/2831 11 4:000018c1 32 <- failed > Intel Corporation > 0.29.2: usb 0c.03.00 8086/2832 11 4:000018e1 32 <- failed > Intel Corporation > 0.29.7: usb 0c.03.20 8086/2836 11 0:fe227000 1024 <- failed > Intel Corporation
so the question is, why were they tried as ISA.0.0.0? (that is, 0x05000000) or is the output misleading. any chance the pin routing is messing things up? in nix, we wildcard any intel southbridge and apply intel remapping. i noticed this particular board's southbridge wasn't recognized. from what i've seen, usb is always pci and never supports msi. i suspect that the standard precludes edge-triggered interrupts, but i haven't verified this. - erik
