On Apr 18, 2012, at 2:05 PM, arn...@skeeve.com wrote: >>> having to write the same set of GUI interfaces >>> three times (X11, windows, Mac OS). >> >> I'd like to put in a good word for Plan 9, in case it gets forgotten. >> And, yes, Qt does not support Plan 9, I guess we'll need to find some >> compromise, if at all possible. >> ++L > > Good point. Unfortunately, until Plan 9 grows a C++ compiler, Qt isn't > an option for it. If/when that does happen, it would be a worthwhile > thing to have there (In My Humble Opinion, of course :-).
We would be glad to work further on such a C++ port with anybody who can handle the Qt end of things so anybody interested in exploring such an endeavor should discuss with us. - Greg
