> Since ls(1) gives the size of the file; since du(1) can not really or at > least not always in an arbitrary context tells the "real" occupation of > disk size, is not ls(1) enough?
plan 9 ls does not have a -R option. - erik
> Since ls(1) gives the size of the file; since du(1) can not really or at > least not always in an arbitrary context tells the "real" occupation of > disk size, is not ls(1) enough?
plan 9 ls does not have a -R option. - erik