Re: [9fans] Building Go on Plan 9

[Skip Tavakkolian]

i think having Go is worth dealing with the beast.

On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 6:57 AM, erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net> wrote:
>> IMO using anything other than Make to build
>> the Go distribution is a fool's errand and
>> simply too much of a maintenance burden.
>> We would have to carefully watch upstream
>> changes to any of the many Makefiles.
>>
>> Using make isn't as bad as some make it out
>> to be and, to be clear, I'm only advocating
>> the use of make to build the distribution;
>> we can still add rules for building tools
>> or libraries written in Go to the standard
>> mkfiles in /sys/src.
>
> the camel has his nose in the tent.
>
> - erik
>