On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyn...@orthanc.ca> wrote: >> There's nothing wrong with mk. It's just that >> I highly doubt we could get a separate set of >> mkfiles included in the Go distribution. > > Have you tried? It's a non-invasive change, and once they are set up it's > unlikely they will need to be updated often. > >
I've tried. The answer is "no". No mkfiles in the tree. I've not watched this thread. Is this another totally different approach? ron
