i'll modify what i said to "... suspect the host os first". it's been my experience that every autoupdate on Ubuntu and Windows brings in its share of new bugs (hopefully less than the number of bugs it fixes)
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:32 PM, erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net> wrote: > On Mon Nov 21 15:20:58 EST 2011, skip.tavakkol...@gmail.com wrote: >> i run 9vx occasionally. a while back i built 9vx from ron's >> repository. i was having problems with it under Ubuntu 10.04 x86_64, >> where sometimes both cores were pegged at 100%; it was a problem with >> linux (judging by ubuntu mailing lists). without changing 9vx, things >> got stable after 10.10 (currently on 11.10). so, when in doubt, >> suspect the host os. > > !? the fact that one bug was found in linux doesn't imply that bugs are > likely > in any host os. the oses are better tested than 9vx, so given no other > information > i would conclude the opposite; 9vx is more likely at fault. and regardless, > we > have little chance of fixing the os. > > - erik > >
