On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 02:20:37PM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote: > > > Russ correctly points out that the problem lies with cpp and not with 8c, > > while careful inspection of the yacc sources including your correction to > > accept // does not reveal any way in which yacc can be held responsible. > > are you giving cpp the -+ option? > cpp doesn't eat // comments by default. > As mentioned, I put considerable effort to avoid cpp and currently have no idea what I've missed. Russ also raised that issue, I have known about -+ since then.
Thanks for bringing it up, anyway. ++L
