On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 07:53:30PM +0200, Lucio De Re wrote: > That suggests that porting Bison is a "must" as anything else will > not meet the criterion of being included in the Go distribution. > Bootstrapping Bison seems to be my main obstacle (it relies on Bison > features, not least the very same %error-verbose I have encountered in > Go), but it can be overcome by using cross-processing from either NetBSD > or UBUNTU, so that's just some effort on my part. > I fear this is the exact opposite of what Bakul recommends. I hope it is clear that my approach is totally contrary to his suggestions, through no ill will on either side :-)
++L
