On Jul 17, 2011, at 11:26 AM, erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net> wrote:
>> BTW, if I understand correctly the purpose of the next C standard, I >> guess there is no urge for kencc to support C99 >> since it is already a transitory only partially supported standard. > > ken's compiler supports the bits of c99 that people have found > important/useful. see /sys/src/cmd/cc/c99. Maybe I'm misunderstanding the inflection, but Isn't it so that C99 used "Ken C" for some of its additions at the time?
