On Sunday, May 01, 2011 06:44:42 PM erik quanstrom wrote: > > I suspect netsurf might actually be better to work from than charon, > > if only because netsurf is already written c rather than limbo, and > > has already been ported to many platforms. > > unless i've completely misunderstood, brian is suggesting to run charon > in plan 9-hosted inferno. >
Ah, I believe you're right; thanks for the correction. I'll risk venturing an opinion on that approach: Running a plan 9 hosted inferno is essentially another take on the vnc or linuxemu workarounds. It won't provide the same freedoms and benefits of a native library/engine/framework.
