On Sunday 01 of May 2011 00:45:48 Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> > Perhaps there's a "Plan 9" way to approach the problem which might
> > involve a "less-huge" amount of work.
> 
> There is nothing "Plan 9" about this.  When a piece of code gets so large
> as to be impossible to understand, it's time to throw it out and start
> over.
> 
> Where we as "engineers" fail is in not making the case that it is cheaper
> for the corporate behemoth to re-write rather than extend, embrace, and
> bloat.
> 
> I can't get started on this right now ...


dare we say, ``Greenspun's Tenth Rule''? :D


-- 
dexen deVries

``One can't proceed from the informal to the formal by formal means.''

Reply via email to