On Fri Mar 25 15:15:59 EDT 2011, lyn...@orthanc.ca wrote: > > i take this as another strike against info. the fact that one > > sees that the editor's docs are 400+ pages, and there's no easy > > way to cut that down to a man page, and yet they proceeded to > > build bloatware to accomidate bloatware. > > That's like blaming Mozilla because you choose to read Sarah Palin's > missives with Firefox.
your defense of info was that it was built to be read a 400+ page reference for emacs. my claim is that if you find a reasonable editor, you won't have a need for info. - erik
