On 11 янв, 02:01, nicklafo...@gmail.com (Nick LaForge) wrote: > I'm curious: do you plan on executing the output of 8c and 8l in an > environment as strange as one the you are building in? You could try > building only programs and then try executing those, i.e., by using > one of > > http://www.chunder.com/plan9/9ee.htmlhttp://swtch.com/9vx/ > > If you just want an x86 kernel, I think it begs the question. The > distribution comes with x86 binaries, and rebuilding the whole system > is as simple as mk. > > Anyway, you may be shocked by this if you come from a linux background > where complilation is viewed as some sort of sacrificial ritual. > > Nick > > On 1/10/11, Artem Novikov <noviko...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I want to build Plan9 from scratch under Windows/*NIX. > > I built working (seems :) toolchain (yacc, 8a, 8c, 8l) under Windows > > XP using Open Watcom Compiller. > > Has anyone done something similar?
Thanks all. May be building from scratch seems strange, but it only fo my Plan9 OS researching. I think building OS using only the source code good for a much better understanding of Plan9. P.S. =) Nick, no, 8* for cross-compilation purpose.
