> if you just want go on plan 9, i think object formats > are a non-sequitor. > But that's not it, really, I want both Go and the ELF capabilities :-)
> calling out the guys who wrote plan 9 for not supporting > object formats that plan 9 never used, seems a bit rude > to me. I am willing to apologise if that is how it's perceived, but the intent is not to insult anyone, but rather to extend the Plan 9 toolchain beyond the Plan 9 scope, something the Go developers did to a great extent and something I would dearly like to retrofit to Plan 9. Getting Go in the bargain is an exciting side effect. ++L
