On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 09:02:36AM +0200, Lucio De Re wrote: > > I was hoping to try 9vx.tgz from swtch.com which is not 9vx*.bz2, but > that does not behave any differently. > s/not 9/now 9/
++L
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 09:02:36AM +0200, Lucio De Re wrote: > > I was hoping to try 9vx.tgz from swtch.com which is not 9vx*.bz2, but > that does not behave any differently. > s/not 9/now 9/
++L