On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Charles Forsyth <fors...@terzarima.net>wrote:
> >close must be synchronous, unless you aim for NFS semantics. > > to be more explicit: think of exclusive-use services, services that wait > for a close to commit, > files with DMEXCL, and files opened ORCLOSE > For DMEXCL and ORCLOSE, we'd always issue synchronously. Perhaps we could turn on async clunk for other files when the chan has CCACHE set (mount -C iirc). We already believe that the fileserver is 'decent' then... -- vs
