Please don't comment on the case at all. On Jul 6, 2010, at 10:13 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> On Tue Jul 6 21:15:59 EDT 2010, mirtchov...@gmail.com wrote: >>> What property? >> >> zfs, i presume? >> >> erik, i care about zfs, tell me more. > > speaking as a private citizen with no "insider" > knowledge in this case .... > > i think it should be obvious to any vaguely careful > thinker that there is no "stolen property" > involved. if i understand the article correctly, > they ment to say "alleged infringement". an earlier > version of the same article made more sense to me: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07/06/nexenta_comment_on_netapp_coraid/ > the current article seems to have undergone > significant declarification. > > i don't know anything about the patents involved > except sun claims there is prior art. > > clearly, coraid won't send commandos to make > sure that you don't use zfs with coraid storage. > > - erik > >
