> Could you (or someone) elaborate on the "C99" battle? I'm wondering whether > this implies critique of the C99 standard or something else (and how this > relates to C under Plan9)
ken's c compiler has some extensions. like unnamed structures. you don't have to use them. i don't think that's an issue. /sys/src/cmd/cc/c99 has a list of basic c99 features and ken's c compiler's status wrt these new features. - erik
