Got it! Changed. I'll also change it along the lines of Erik's suggestion.
As a note, I thought that 9vx ran on top of the p9p stuff. Thanks again, EBo -- "Devon H. O'Dell" <devon.od...@gmail.com> said: > 2010/4/11 EBo <e...@sandien.com>: > > I thought p9p uses it for the root of the Plan 9 tree? At least that is > > what > > the ebuilds imply. Maybe I am using the wrong term for what PLAN9 points > > to. > > That's true, but in the case of 9vx, the tree it points to contains > actual plan 9 binaries, whereas p9p binaries are compiled for the host > system. Since it is very feasible that someone may run p9p and 9vx on > the same machine (I do, for instance), it would be a good idea to not > overload the env var. > > --dho > > > EBo -- > > > > > > erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net> said: > > > >> recommend using a different environment variable > >> other than PLAN9, since that is taken by p9p to mean > >> something else. > >> > >> - erik > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > --
