On Monday 29 March 2010 13:07:23 Georg Lehner wrote: > The recent survey of how Plan9 inventors use Plan9 today (it seems > mostly they don't) has cast some shadow of doubt on me that day > to day computer work is ideally done on a Plan9 terminal. >
Day to day computer work will not generally be done on a Plan9 terminal until Glenda finally overcomes her profoundly crippling case of automysophobia. Unfortunately however, it appears that she is surrounded by folks who are single-mindedly determined to keep her inside a sterile plastic bubble - according to these people, linux and gnu are, apparently, the boogey men that will certainly 'get her' should she ever leave the confines of the artificial cocoon that's been built up around her. 9fans: keep on worrying over 'contamination' from the real world, in the mean time, Plan 9 is a precious little snowflake that is neigh useless outside of an extraordinarily narrow variety of use cases: On Monday 29 March 2010 13:16:59 erik quanstrom wrote: > > I would also be happy to hear about how non-coding activities are > > typically handled by using a Plan9 system. > > what non-coding activities? ☺ > Plan9: an old-school IDE and a file server wrapped into one. The mind reels. Sometimes, less is _not_ more.
