> > > The following two subroutines are defined and not used anywhere. Should > > > they > > > redefined as void or possibly removed? > > > > it's perfectly reasonable to leave code in for testing purposes > > that never gets called. > > Agreed. Should the declarations be changed then to void instead of static > void so that it does not give warnings? I've worked on some projects where > the leads where very pedantic about cleaning up all warnings and was wondering > what the consensus amongst the plan 9 crowd.
how about changing 9c so you don't get this warning? - erik
