> 1) real plan9 to the same place > 2) qemu plan9 on Fedora to the same place As I wrote above, I made exactly the same test on exactly the same HW (and internet connection). 1. Native Plan9. 2. Native Fedora 10 with p9p.
> "It's slow, what's wrong" is perhaps a little vague. Not precisely measured (I can do it today). My estimation of the time spent by 'ls' command in contrib directory: - 9pfuse on Fedora was more than 10 times slower. Pavel
