That makes their use of the word extension wrong, but in that case
starting over would seem (and probably is) best.
i think it fits the definition of extension. the protocol is
compatable with dnssec-unaware implementations.
Since part of the base was modified, but it's still backwards
compatable extension isn't the right term, I can not think of the
proper word; I am being anal.
At any rate, was there a date this would be implimented? I'm looking
forewards to seeing how much this actually fixes.
- erik
