That makes their use of the word extension wrong, but in that case
starting over would seem (and probably is) best.

i think it fits the definition of extension.  the protocol is
compatable with dnssec-unaware implementations.
Since part of the base was modified, but it's still backwards compatable extension isn't the right term, I can not think of the proper word; I am being anal.

At any rate, was there a date this would be implimented? I'm looking forewards to seeing how much this actually fixes.
- erik


Reply via email to