So how far did you get? I'm currently reading about that package system and think we could send a 9vx package to the maintainer when ready... I'm also not sure yet about the best way of binding packages directly into the filesystem instead of ftp getting them
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:30 PM, ron minnich <rminn...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Anthony Sorace <ano...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Tiny Core Linux looks interesting. Played around a bit in a VM tonight >> and will be trying it on the ThinkPad tomorrow. I'm curious about your >> setup. I assume you're using 9vx directly for graphics, no more >> drawterm? You run within X? > > yes, because I don't think there is a vx32 implemention that uses > devfb. Which is just > as well, the devfb drawterm was nice but when it fails, well, you're > in trouble. > > I'd like to have a cdrom that just boots up into tinycore and vx32. > > ron > >
