no apple-pcs here, but vmware seems to be the faster On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Francisco J Ballesteros <n...@lsub.org> wrote: > Yep. I just wanted a version with full acpi support, and it > seems that version 5 was what I wanted. > that's handy to debug acpi code. > > but yes, it requires a mac. > > > On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Joseph Stewart <joseph.stew...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Just to clarify... Parallels 5 requires a Mac. There are howerver, older >> versions for M$ and Linux as well as their Server Virtualization products. >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallels,_Inc. >> -joe >> >> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:14 AM, erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net> >> wrote: >>> >>> > Just to confirm what Geoff said. >>> > >>> > Parallels 5 works like a charm with Plan 9. >>> > Also, it seems to have full ACPI support, not that this is >>> > important for Plan 9 yet. >>> > >>> > Thanks >>> > >>> > On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 3:53 PM, erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net> >>> > wrote: >>> > >> I've heard nothing but bad things about VirtualBox. Mostly from Plan >>> > >> 9 >>> > >> people(where the results have been uniformly bad), but also from >>> > >> folks >>> > >> trying to useother OSes. It seems the worst of the breed across the >>> > >> board. >>> > > >>> > > has anyone tried 9atom on virtualbox? i think there's a good chance >>> > > virtualbox has some of the same issues i had with the ich7r. >>> >>> parallels requires a mac. >>> >>> - erik >>> >> >> > >
-- Federico G. Benavento
