> Sure. Theres' lots of good candidates out there. It's just that PXE is
> not one of them. PXE was designed for a world of binary formats and
> tiny, incapable network bootstraps, and it was obsolete when it was
> designed over a decade ago.

This reminds of a similar situation many years ago: it doesn't help to
criticise when a concrete alternative isn't being offered.  PXE works,
even Plan 9 knows how to deal with it.  If there is even one better
alternative out there, there sure isn't much support for it.  Maybe
the wrong metric, but it is a metric that the marketplace understands.

Were I as skilled as some of the people on this list, I'd build me a
bootstrapping paravirtualiser modelled on the Plan 9 kernel, then
provide a device interface just like Plan 9's that all kernels could
tie easily into.  I'd even dare call it a microkernel if no one can
provide a better candidate for that label.  Sadly, I doubt I'll ever
come even close to what may turn out to be merely a pipe dream.

Just some musings while I ponder what to make of the sheevaplug, now
that it seems to work...  Good work to all who contributed.

++L


Reply via email to