It seems that changing a bit fs(3) can suffice and is generic enough for all usages required. In the end it might result in code removed instead of adding code, but time will tell. As of today, it's only an experiment.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:10 PM, erik quanstrom <quans...@coraid.com> wrote: >> fs is already larger than it was, there's an experimental >> ongoing version that knows enough of partitioning to help >> usb and others on that respect. > > why not just use sdloop(3)? > > - erik > >
