> anyone looked at this or given it any thought?

I've been working on a bluetooth implementation which should be
ready for initial release soon.  Just the core communication layers
(usb-hci transport, hci, l2cap, rfcomm), and fairly rudimentary:
I've tried to pick a minimal useful subset rather than support
the whole 1420-page Core V2.1+EDR standard.

The interface follows the normal Plan 9 /net model, so the usual
dial/announce/listen operations work pretty much as expected,
and you can do things like:

  aux/listen1 bt!*!77 /bin/exportfs
  import -A bt!00123456789A!77 / /n/blue

A bit of tweaking to cs(8) would allow the use of "friendly"
device names in place of 12-hexdigit bluetooth device addresses.


Reply via email to